COGNITUM testnet is live, become a founding validator →
Verified AI · Witness Chain

The AI thinks.
COGNITUM witnesses.

AI reasoning is checked by the Reasoning Verification Framework, then sealed on-chain with a post-quantum signature. A tamper-evident record of what was reasoned, how it was checked, and when, that anyone can verify. It is proof of provenance and verification, not proof of truth.

FIPS 204 · ML-DSA65
FIPS 203 · ML-KEM768
FIPS 205 · SLH-DSA ready · audit-gated
BFT Consensus
Testnet Live
0
NIST post-quantum standards
0
of transactions signed PQ
0
average block time
1B
fixed max supply (COGN)
Verifiable AI evidence

The AI thinks. COGNITUM witnesses.

High-risk AI increasingly has to carry verifiable proof of what it did and how it was checked. COGNITUM anchors that evidence, tamper-evident and post-quantum-signed, so anyone can verify it. It is proof of provenance and verification, not proof of truth.

01

Think

An AI model produces its reasoning off-chain: the ordered steps that lead to a conclusion.

Model
02

Check

The Reasoning Verification Framework runs deterministic checks and adversarial cross-examiners, then reaches a verdict.

RVF
03

Seal

The verdict and a hash of the exact reasoning are signed with ML-DSA65 and anchored in a block, tamper-evident for good.

Witness Chain
Use case · Government

Public money, made verifiable

A concept transparency ledger for a Philippine city: budgets, disbursements, contracts, permits and projects, each record hash-verifiable and sealed. Try the live tamper test. Prototype with synthetic data.

Open the demo ↗
Why now

“Harvest now, decrypt later.”

Adversaries are already recording today’s encrypted data to unlock it once quantum computers mature. In 2024, NIST finalized the post-quantum standards, and governments are targeting migration by 2030-2035. The largest chains face a multi-year retrofit of cryptography they were never built for, COGNITUM was quantum-resistant from its very first block.

Post-quantum, across the whole stack

Not a patch on old cryptography, built on the 2024 NIST standards from genesis.

Quantum-Resistant Signatures

Every transaction, block, and validator vote is signed with ML-DSA65, the address is the post-quantum public key.

FIPS 204 · ML-DSA

Quantum-Resistant Key Exchange

Node-to-node sessions are encrypted with ML-KEM768 + AES-256-GCM, so peer traffic stays private against quantum attacks.

FIPS 203 · ML-KEM

Hash-Based Backup

A conservative SLH-DSA fallback on a different math family - implemented and tested, activation audit-gated - ready to stand if lattices are ever weakened.

FIPS 205 · SLH-DSA · audit-gated

Built in the Open

Live testnet, honest about what is operational vs. roadmap, multi-round internal audits, published limitations.

No hype, verifiable

Coming soon

What we're building next on the quantum-safe rail. Funded roadmap, not yet live, shown here so you can see where COGNITUM is headed.

Soon

Real-World Assets

Tokenize gold, real estate and bonds on a quantum-safe rail, each token backed 1:1 and redeemable.

Soon
1/1

NFTs & Collectibles

Mint, own and trade non-fungible tokens and asset certificates, secured by post-quantum signatures.

Soon
AB

Cross-chain Atomic Swaps

Trustless HTLC swaps to other chains, no custodian in the middle. Testnet demo today, production next.

Soon

More Bridges

Additional EVM and non-EVM chains beyond the current wCOGN bridge, one liquid, quantum-safe hub.

On the roadmap and not a promise of a live feature. Timing depends on the audit and mainnet milestones on the roadmap.

Who's actually quantum-resistant?

An honest, fact-checkable look, including the chains that got there before us.

ChainSignatureQuantum-resistant?
BitcoinECDSAPlanning
EthereumECDSAPlanning
SolanaEd25519 + opt-in Winternitz vaultPartial · opt-in, storage only
AlgorandEd25519 + Falcon state proofsPartial · since 2022
QRLXMSS · stateful, pre-FIPSYes · since 2018
COGNITUMML-DSA65 · FIPS 204Yes · testnet

We are not the first quantum-resistant chain, QRL has signed every transaction with hash-based XMSS since 2018, and Algorand has run Falcon state proofs since 2022 (its consensus layer is still Ed25519). Solana offers an opt-in hash-based vault, but for storage only, it needs a fresh address per transaction and its everyday signatures are still Ed25519. What is different here: COGNITUM is built on the finalized 2024 NIST standards (FIPS 204 ML-DSA-65, FIPS 203 ML-KEM-768) for account-level signatures, by default on every transaction, stateless, and integer-only, avoiding the timing side-channel surface of Falcon's floating-point math and the key-reuse hazard of stateful XMSS. COGNITUM is a testnet: our cryptography is production-grade, our network is not yet decentralized.

Comparison last reviewed July 2026.

Where COGNITUM stands

No hype. What is true and checkable today, and what is still ahead, stated plainly.

Verifiable today
  • Post-quantum signatures on every transaction, block, and vote (ML-DSA-65, FIPS 204).
  • Post-quantum key exchange for peer and TLS sessions (ML-KEM-768, FIPS 203).
  • Zero classical cryptography in the value path, and a fixed 1,000,000,000 supply cap, both checkable yourself in ~60 seconds.
  • Full stack live on public testnet: wallet, explorer, DeFi, governance, compliance.
curl -s https://cognitum.global/verify-chain.mjs | node -
In progress (funded roadmap)
  • Independent third-party security audit, the funded next step, not yet done.
  • Decentralization: 5 to 10 independent validators. Today the network runs under a single operator.
  • Trustless block import (quorum certificates) and the hybrid dual-signature path, built and tested, activation is audit-gated.
  • Mainnet, and any future token distribution, only under qualified securities counsel. Testnet COGN has no cash value today.

Our cryptography is production-grade; our network is not yet decentralized. We would rather under-claim and let you verify than ask you to trust us.

PQC-READYcognitum.globalQUREADY
Website TLS: post-quantum key exchange, verified by QuReady’s PQC checker